How to Determine a Presumptive Sentences in Minnesota
Taking effect for offenses factually occurring after May 1, 1980, an offender who is convicted of a felony in the state of Minnesota faces what is called a “presumptive sentence,” as determined under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. (Please note: for offenses occurring and the date of offense being on or before April 30, 1980, then the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines should not be used to sentence the offender in that case, as they are inapplicable by law.) In order to determine the proper and legally-appropriate presumptive sentence for a particular felony offender, one must locate the correct block on the “Sentencing Guidelines Grids.” This is done by evaluating two factors: criminal history and offense severity. Each of these factors is considered to be the most important factors under Minnesota sentencing and releasing laws. Here we look at just the “criminal history” factor as it relates to a person’s ultimate presumptive sentence under Minnesota’s sentencing scheme, called the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines.
(For more information on determining a person’s “offense severity” (as dictated by the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines), go to How to Determine a Presumptive Sentence in Minnesota: Offense Severity.)
Even considering the importance of an offender’s criminal history under the Sentencing Guidelines, overall the guidelines have reduced the emphasis historically given to an offender’s criminal history by Minnesota sentencing judges. Under past judicial practice, a person’s “criminal history” was the primary factor in dispositional decisions. Under current practices found within the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, the particular offense for which a person is convicted is the primary factor, and an individual’s criminal history is a secondary factor in such dispositional decisions. Also, in the past there have been a number of different problems that have arisen as courts have tried to use a person’s “criminal history” in determining what sentence is appropriate and how an offender’s sentence may be increased or decreased because of such a person’s criminal history or lack thereof, respectively. Such problems include not having uniform standards regarding what should (or should not) be included in a particular offender’s criminal history, no weighting format for assigning differing weights for differing types of offenses committed by a person in their past, and no systematic process to check the accuracy of the information alleged to be the “criminal history” of a particular offender.
Thus, the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines provide a more uniform standard for the inclusion and weighting of criminal history information. The sentencing hearing at the trial court level provides a process to better assure the accuracy of the information in an individual case and for an individual offender. These additions and changes (and hopefully improvements) are believed by the Commission to result in an increase in fairness and equity in the consideration of a person’s criminal history by the sentencing courts statewide. That said, the Commission also acknowledges that records and agencies are fallible, stating “[n]o system of criminal history record keeping ever will be totally accurate and complete, and any sentencing system will have to rely on the best available criminal history information.”
Criminal History Index
A criminal history index is found in the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Grids. The criminal history index is represented the horizontal axis of the Grid. It is comprised of the following components:
- prior felony record;
- custody status at the time of the offense;
- prior misdemeanor record;
- prior gross misdemeanor record; and
- prior juvenile record for young adult felons.
The classification of prior offenses as petty misdemeanors, misdemeanors, gross misdemeanors, or felonies is determined on the basis of current Minnesota offense definitions and sentencing policies. This means that in order to determine an accurate criminal history score, a person must look to the classifications in place at the time an individual’s criminal history score is being established (and not the time the offense was committed or any other time). This is true except when a monetary threshold determines the offense classification. When this is the case, the monetary classification in effect at the time the prior offense was committed (not the current threshold) determines the offense classification in calculating the criminal history index.
Offenses which are petty misdemeanors by statute, or which are deemed petty misdemeanors by Minn. R. Crim. P. 23.02 (the only sanction is a fine less than the misdemeanor fine level defined in statute) and 23.04, are not used to compute the criminal history index. At the time of this writing, the only possible penalty for a petty misdemeanor under Minnesota law is a fine of not more than $300.
Experienced Defense Attorney at JUX Law Firm
As a criminal defense attorney Jesse Hall at JUX Law Firm has the experienced necessary to fully defend you and your legal rights in court and at trial. Jesse Hall believes that simply telling a person his or her legal options is not enough. Jesse Hall’s clients know and trust him to not only explain their legal option but to also know the consequences for choosing any one of those options. Knowing and understanding Minnesota’s criminal laws is very important in finding an attorney to represent you. But finding a lawyer who also knows and understands the ramifications of decisions and what possible sentences may result is invaluable. Call Jesse Hall today – he takes pride in fight for you and your rights. Don’t let the government attorneys or law enforcement scare you into doing anything. Fight back and win!
CONTACT CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY JESSE HALL TODAY
You can arrange a NO OBLIGATION consultation with him immediately. Time may be working against you, so it is very important in every criminal case or investigation that you contact legal counsel right away. Attorney Jesse Hall takes steps to not only defend you by preparing your case for trial (and having you found “not guilty”), but he also takes the steps necessary to force the government into a favorable disposition – including having your case and charges dismissed completely.