Minnesota Trademark Attorney

Considering Trademark Registration

Before filing a federal trademark application, here are a few considerations.

First, it is important to determined whether you actually want to register a trademark. Do you understand the difference between a trademark, copyright, and patent? Would common law trademark rights be sufficient? Is the word or phrase you want to register even protectable under trademark law?

Once you determine that a trademark is what you need, you need to identify what class of services and/or goods are relevant. You will generally pick an International Class based on the industry where your goods or services will be used.

You will need to establish a clear representation of the mark you want to register. Then, clearly and precisely identify the goods and/or services to which the mark will apply.

Finally, identify whether you are registering a mark for current use or the intent to use in the future.

The filing fee depends on the number of marks, classes and the version of the form being used. The fee cannot not be refunded, even if the trademark is not registered.

Many areas of law can be done on your own, but trademark registration involves many potential problems, so use of an experienced trademark attorney is recommended.

What is a Trademark?

It is your business identity expressed as a name, number, symbol, design, slogan, and three-dimensional marks (product shapes). Trademarks are applicable to products and service marks are applicable to services (collectively known as “marks”), both of which are treated identically under the law.

Trademarks as well as service marks are applicable to not-for-profit and for profit organizations, and the mark may be registered on the state or federal level, but since federal trademark law preempts state law, state trademark registration is usually of little or no value.

Uses of Trademarks

Trademarks serve as a source identifier to the world to prevent consumer confusion. A company’s intellectual property may be the most valuable asset it owns. Think of it this way: how else would consumers come to know your business identity if not through the name you promote? Trademarking a brand, slogan, or logo gives it protection in a wide variety of environments. For example, trademark protection is applied each time you use your mark in association with

  • a product
  • product packaging
  • stationary
  • website
  • signage
  • advertising materials
  • exhibit booths
  • domain names
  • meta tags

As your business evolves, so does the reputation or goodwill attached to your products and services. Trademark law provides your company with an important tool to protect your company’s brands.

Benefits of Trademark Registration

As your company establishes a good reputation, you will want to prevent competitors from using a similar name that could confuse your clients, target market, or the public at large. Federal trademark registration prevents others from using your name in a confusingly similar way.

Specifically, federal trademark registration provides the following benefits:

  • A federally registered trademark can be recorded with the United States Bureau of Customs to exclude the importation of goods with marks that infringe the mark
  • Claims as infringement of a federally registered trademark qualify for federal jurisdiction in United States federal court
  • Special statutory remedies are available for a federally registered trademark
  • Counterfeiting a federally registered trademark is a criminal offense
  • Federal trademark registration allows you to use the registration symbol
  • Federal trademark registration can be used as a basis for obtaining registration in foreign countries
  • Federal trademark registration establishes nationwide constructive notice to all others of your claim to the trademark
  • Federal trademark registration is prima facie evidence of your exclusive right to use the trademark
  • The right to use a trademark that has been registered and in use for five years becomes “incontestable” upon the filing of an affidavit (this is important)

Having a trademark that is “incontestable” is a big deal. In theory, incontestable means that the mark is immune from most legal challenges. In practice, incontestable means the trademark is somewhat difficult to contest.

First Use of a Mark

Companies may not use a mark that is already trademarked. In order to obtain a trademark, one requirement is that the person or company be the first to use that mark in the marketplace. Thus, as a general rule, a company may not trademark a mark that is already in use in the marketplace. Additionally, by using a mark that is already in the marketplace, a company may be liable for trademark infringement.

Infringing on an Existing Trademark

Use of a mark that is trademarked, without permission, infringes on that trademark. Use of a mark that is deceptively or confusingly similar to a trademark, without permission, infringes on that trademark. A person does not have to register a mark in order to have common law trademark rights. By simply being the first to use a mark in the marketplace, a person acquires a common law trademark in the county where the mark is used.

Proving Infringement on an Existing Trademark

To prove trademark infringement, a plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) that the defendant used the plaintiff’s trademark, without the plaintiff’s permission, in commerce. For infringement, the use of this trademark means use in the form of a reproduction, copy, counterfeit, or colorable imitation of the plaintiff’s mark in connection with the distribution or advertisement of goods in a way that is likely to cause confusion as to the source of the goods. The infringing mark need not be an exact copy of the trademark.

When viewed in its entirety, if the mark used by the defendant is likely to cause confusion in the minds of reasonably prudent purchases or uses as to the source of the product in question, it infringes on the plaintiff’s trademark.

Other Ways to Infringe on an Existing Trademark

A person may also be liable for infringing upon the trademark of another by merely inducing another to infringe on the trademark. Even if a person did not know of an existing trademark, the person is liable for trademark infringement if the person should have known of it. Often this is determined by looking at whether a reasonable person would have known of it, were that person in the same situation.

Our Trademark Services

We take a strategic approach to protect the immediate and future rights of every client’s intellectual property. We consider intellectual property protection from the perspective of the business owner, and the value that intellectual property is to future revenue of the company. By exploring the benefits and risks of your alternatives, we will help to create a comprehensive, focused solution for your to protect your company’s intellectual property.

Updated by attorney Aaron Hall on July 31, 2013

Related Posts

Zerorez v. U.S. Olympic Committee – Memo in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA HSK LLC (d/b/a ZEROREZ) v. UNITED STATES OLYMPICS COMMITTEE Civil File No. 16-civ-02641 (WMW-KMM) Plaintiff HSK LLC (“Zerorez”) submits this memorandum of law in opposition to Defendant United States Olympics Committee’s (“USOC”) motion to dismiss. Zerorez opposes USOC’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter

Can You File Trademark Cases in State Court? Yes.

Trademark infringement lawsuits are usually brought in federal court, but the law does not prohibit such cases from being adjudicated in state court. Federal courts have original jurisdiction in trademark cases. 28 U.S. Code § 1338(b). However, federal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction in federal courts. This was recently explained by a state district court

Zerorez v. U.S. Olympic Committee – Lawsuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA   HSK LLC, d.b.a. ZEROREZ,   Plaintiff,   vs.   United States Olympic Committee,     Defendant.     Court File No.0:16-cv-02641 HSK LLC v. United States Olympic Committee   COMPLAINT   Plaintiff HSK LLC, for its Complaint against Defendant United States Olympic Committee, states and alleges as

USOC Email to Minnesota Business Owner

From: Karissa Johnson Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:20 AM To: [Name Redacted]  <__________@usoc.org> Subject: Trademark rules Hello, I am hoping to understand better the rules related to social media use of the term Olympics and related terms. I understand my business cannot have any Olympic-themed events or anything. But what I'm confused about is whether we can discuss

Zerorez v. U.S. Olympic Committee – A Social Media Free Speech Case

On August 4, 2016, JUX filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) in U.S. District Court on behalf of Zerorez of Minnesota over the right to talk about the Olympics on social media. Case: HSK LLC, d.b.a. ZEROREZ v. United States Olympic Committee Court file number: 0:16-cv-02641 HSK LLC v. United States Olympic Committee

Quick Definition: USPTO “Use-In-Commerce” Application

What is a “use-in-commerce” application with the USPTO? A “use-in-commerce” basis occurs when the trademark is being used in the sale or transport of goods, or the rendering of services in “interstate” commerce between more than one state.  For services, the mark must be used in the sale or advertising of the services. For more information

How to Trademark a Series of Books, Movies, or Other Artistic Works

How do you trademark the title of a book series, movie series, or other artistic works? This is a question authors and artists often ask. Fortunately, the United States Trademark Office allows you to trademark a series of books, movies, or related titles of other artistic works. The United States Trademark Office explains the answer:

Business Names and Trademarks

Difference Between a Business Name and a Trademark I often get asked by clients who are starting businesses, “why do I need to trademark my business name? I already look through the Minnesota Secretary of State’s website and no one in the state has my business name.” However, merely clearing a name with the Secretary

Trademark Licensing

Trademark Licensing Checklist A trademark license involves an agreement between two parties where one part who owns a trademark allows a second party to “license” the trademark’s use. The party that owns the trademark is the “licensor” and the party that is using the trademark is the “licensee.” The trademark license agreement will discuss, generally,

Defending Trademarks

What Types of Trademarks Are the Easiest to Defend? Types of trademarks fall into one of five categories based on their distinctiveness. The categories are also known as the “Abercrombie Classification” from the seminal case Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, 537 F.2d 4 (2nd Cir. 1976). The more distinctive a mark, the easier

Trademark Registration: Use These Examples (Specimens) to Show Use

Trademark registration requires you to show the actual use of your trademark within the context of your offerings to the public. These examples are called specimens. Specimens show how you actually use your mark with your goods or services. Specimens are not the mark alone—they show your mark in context with your products or services. A specimen for

Commonly Asked Trademark Questions

Below is a list of commonly asked trademark and copyright questions and their answers: No. In order to obtain any type of common law trademark protection (federal protection requires filing for a trademark), you must actually use the mark in with your goods or services. Yes. Federal registration is not required to establish rights in

Trademark: Secondary Meaning, Distinctiveness & Confusingly Similar

U.S. Supreme Court Articulates Secondary Meaning, Distinctiveness & Confusingly Similar In December 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in two trademark cases. It has been almost ten years since the Court has issued any substantive decision involving trademark law. One of the two cases was B&B Hardware v. Hargis. (The

Breweries and Trademark Law

With the explosion of new breweries in Minnesota and elsewhere around the country, we are seeing overlap in the names given to breweries and their beers. This has resulted in trademark disputes as breweries attempt to build and protect their brands. While breweries gain some common law trademark rights by using their brewery and beer

Trademark: Tacking, Legal Equivalent & Confusingly Similar

In December 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in two trademark cases. It has been almost ten years since the Court has issued any substantive decision involving trademark law. One of the two cases was Hana Financial v. Hana Bank. (The other covered trademark secondary meaning and distinctiveness.) This case

No Trademarks for Cannabis

In what is yet another clash between state law and federal prohibition of marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has held steadfast in its refusal to register trademarks for marijuana based products. Naturally, business owners in the medical (and recreational) marijuana want to protect their business and

Brewing Beer…It’s All in the Name!

Craft breweries have become increasingly popular in recent years and there is no sign of this trend slowing down. Minnesota alone is home base for about 50 breweries, and according to the Brewers Association, there was an 81 percent jump in craft beer that is produced in Minnesota. (The New Yorker made a great map

Trademarks: Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution

It’s All About the Frap Coffee giant Starbucks takes protecting its trademark Frappuccino seriously. Starbucks owns the trademark “FRAPPUCCINO” in the United States. For those who are not familiar with a Starbucks Frappuccino, it is a line of frozen coffee beverages that is blended with ice and other sweet ingredients and usually topped with whipped

Trademark Unfair Competition: “Passing Off”

Outside the trademark arena, the idea of unfair competition exists in common law and statutes to compensate businesses that have suffered an injury through deceptive or wrongful business practices. In a trademark situation an injured party can bring an unfair competition claim under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act. Section 43(a) provides that: Any person

A Trademark Dispute Over Light Sabers and Lagers

The Disney-owned production company, Lucasfilm Ltd., filed an opposition to Walton Street Brewing Corp.’s application to register the trademark for its beer aptly named “Empire Strikes Bock.” Walton Street Brewery describes its “Empire Strikes Bock” lager as a “spring lager…brewed with German malt & hops and then lagered for six weeks. Extremely clean and refreshing.”